Skip to main content

Marginalized Debate

The media has made a big to-do about the Rick Santelli "rant" on CNBC recently. The first thing that anyone needs to know about the media is that it is never intentionally meant to be informative or helpful in a way that affects their lives in a meaningful and positive way. What the media IS meant for is selling products and controlling information to serve the interests of those who run it. Any instance of the contrary is unintended or accidental. That said, let us all please avoid the fantasy that this "rant" we all witnessed was a moment of truth slipping through the cracks or that it was anything other than a staging point for controlled and marginalized debate. This particular type of propaganda always reminds me of a conflict one might have with someone who is completely wrong or crazy yet some incense-burning, age of Aquarius conscious wacka-doodle floats out of the woodworks and insists that "there are two sides to every story and the truth is somewhere in the middle". That type of Bazooka Joe wrapper psychology is not only useless in most of our daily lives but dangerous in areas of public policy and discourse given its context.

I'm not asserting that in many cases of conflict there aren't shared responsibilities for negative outcomes, because most of the time there are, but truth is truth either absolutely or not at all. The fnord message in this rant story is "Yes there were some greedy wall street speculators like Madoff who are to blame, but lazy and foolish Americans who instigated the housing crash are just as much to blame if not more, so let's find a happy medium, let's find the 'truth in the middle'. And oh by the way, the financial system itself is fine.".

So again it's bad players and not bad rules themselves that get the blame in our national “debates”. Never mind the Federal Reserve system and fractional reserve banking mechanisms that cause inflation and create boom/bust cycles, or bank and corporate insiders who egregiously mismanage their businesses then receive massive bailouts from public dollars and do it again and again. Maybe it's none of these institutions of systematic pillaging of the public wealth that have operated with no accountability for decades, maybe it's the few hundred million in bad mortgage loans that were issued in the last few years, or the next door neighbor who wanted that extra bathroom. I know, let's stand around the water cooler and debate these two false opposites and see if we can find a truthful happy medium, let's do that because we are sensible and because we are so well-informed.

Robert Ferguson


  1. Believe it or not I am keeping my fingers crossed in hopes of the collapse. I think it will be like giving birth. The labor will suck but the pay off sweet. I often wonder how money became the new god. And how people became detached from financial management on the local and international scene. Its almost as if a spell has been cast on the public at large.I'll call it.........The zombie slave, believe what the government tells you spell........

    I think the only to break this spell is the collapse. I think I read that in the alchemists spell guide or something..LMFAO...

    The collapse will do wonders. And we have front row seats.....


  2. You probably already heard of this, but Jon Stewart was talking about this same thing; how the wall street gamblers used our money to ruin the economy and how they got payed tax dollars to do it.

    Good blog by the way, I like the style.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No one deserves a long prison sentence more than this piece of shit Jew bag.
The modern Left is woefully ignorant of real economics and its history. A true understanding of economic history would instantly reveal Keynesians like Paul Krugman for the hocus-pocus frauds they are. A true understanding of economic history would also instantly dispel the myth of “Systematic Racism”. It’s capitalism stupid, the real free market capitalism that the US has only known for brief periods in its history in the mid to late 19th century, not the crony-capitalist/socialist hybrid creature that we have today thanks to the unholy alliance of the modern Republican Party (Neocons) and the Progressive Left.  A desire for profits is not intrinsically morally bad, it never has been, and in fact is the only reason the world has what little wealth and technological advancement that it has.

The desire for profit and to exchange favorably as a market actor is absolutely color blind and for reasons of practicality alone. Would even the most proven racist deny himself bigger profits beca…
Fidel Castro on Gays: "We would never come to believe that a homosexual could embody the conditions and requirements of conduct that would enable us to consider him a true revolutionary, a true communist militant,” "...a deviation of that nature clashes with the concept we have of what a militant communist should be.”. "They are worms, sexual perverts and criminals...."

Liberals: ........................................

Trump bans transgender people from serving in the military?

Liberals: "Bigot!!!!!"

Stephen Colbert: "F*ck you!"

Okie Dokie then. Another example of the willful ignorance and active hypocrisy of Liberals on the "moral" issues they claim to care about so much. At least the neocon Republicans will say it straight to your face that they don't give a shit and proceed to bomb the crap out of people. Liberals will put on that degenerate Lennon's 'Imagine', have a good cry about peace and love, talk about suppor…