Skip to main content

Change We Can Believe In?

President Obama is heralded by the press as some great messiah of change while, as usual, the real domestic and foreign policies of the corporate/bank cartel government of the United States stay the same and continue without interruption in operational terms. The US "Embassy" in Baghdad is the size of 110 football fields and has cost close to 80 billion dollars to build. The truth is the masters of the world never intend to leave Iraq, so far as their control of the flow and price of energy in the country is concerned and whatever it requires, by force, to maintain it. The only argument the so-called "left" has had during the entire Iraq war has been its execution or timing, or "the way it was managed", hauntingly familiar to the arguments made by the Camelot knights of the Kennedy Democrat era regarding the Vietnam War. Now we have Kerry, Clinton, or some other "dove" assuming disconsolate looks on their faces as they pontificate about maintaining a moral authority, all while their 2003 votes in the house and senate helped pave the way for the killing and/or maiming of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians, including women and children.

Obama and his team have already stepped up their bellicose rhetoric about Afghanistan, the "real front in the war on terror", to the gleeful reception of many rank and file Democrats who are so sure that we have it right on this one. The truth is both the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions were part of the plan to control the TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) Pipeline far into the 21st century and beyond, or so long as fossil fuels are relevant as a means of imperial control. The main reason there is somewhat less violence in Iraq now is because most of the population has simply fled the country into Syria, Jordan and Iran. The people who remain are either the few who value money (our bribes) over the security of their homeland who in turn do our bidding in the "Iraqi Government", those who have just accepted our occupation, many of whom will end up working in some periphery of the military bases and Embassy (I can already see the young Iraqi women working as whores for some local GIs and government contractors in bars in the not so distant future), or those who refuse to comply or take our bribes and resist, through whatever means they deem necessary or possible, the horrific forces of imperial greed. Oh yeah, those guys are called the "Terrorists".

Somalia has crumbled into complete chaos and has worsened markedly since the CIA-backed government collapsed in 2006 and the US military interventions that have followed. The cruise ship hijacking media coverage was subterfuge for this message: "We have to go get those kidnapping, murdering Somali bastards!". This follows the usual formula of media coverage concerning military deployment which is, if it requires more than covert ops, the effort of planting the seed of justification for US soldiers dying into the minds of the citizens through the demonization of the "enemy" and the galvanization of our cause, concealing whatever imperial machination it may happen to truly be.

So here we are, with the Obama administration dutifully following the same standards of invasion, repression, oppression and violence we've seen in US foreign policy for over a hundred years while at present the whole world rejoices the inevitable salvation that will be his presidency. Mr. Obama is remarkably more effective than many presidents in history at influencing, through his oratory, the people of this country who may in turn and unwittingly grant him real powers of control that Bush would have reveled, had he had the ability to achieve them. What's more, what will be the result of such an advancement of power for our savior?


Robert Ferguson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No one deserves a long prison sentence more than this piece of shit Jew bag.

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.805112
The modern Left is woefully ignorant of real economics and its history. A true understanding of economic history would instantly reveal Keynesians like Paul Krugman for the hocus-pocus frauds they are. A true understanding of economic history would also instantly dispel the myth of “Systematic Racism”. It’s capitalism stupid, the real free market capitalism that the US has only known for brief periods in its history in the mid to late 19th century, not the crony-capitalist/socialist hybrid creature that we have today thanks to the unholy alliance of the modern Republican Party (Neocons) and the Progressive Left.  A desire for profits is not intrinsically morally bad, it never has been, and in fact is the only reason the world has what little wealth and technological advancement that it has.

The desire for profit and to exchange favorably as a market actor is absolutely color blind and for reasons of practicality alone. Would even the most proven racist deny himself bigger profits beca…
Fidel Castro on Gays: "We would never come to believe that a homosexual could embody the conditions and requirements of conduct that would enable us to consider him a true revolutionary, a true communist militant,” "...a deviation of that nature clashes with the concept we have of what a militant communist should be.”. "They are worms, sexual perverts and criminals...."

Liberals: ........................................

Trump bans transgender people from serving in the military?

Liberals: "Bigot!!!!!"

Stephen Colbert: "F*ck you!"

Okie Dokie then. Another example of the willful ignorance and active hypocrisy of Liberals on the "moral" issues they claim to care about so much. At least the neocon Republicans will say it straight to your face that they don't give a shit and proceed to bomb the crap out of people. Liberals will put on that degenerate Lennon's 'Imagine', have a good cry about peace and love, talk about suppor…