Exogenous leadership will always betray the endogenous interests of nations in that the farther away an orbit of decision-making exists from the people within its purview, the more likely it becomes that its policies will be tyrannical. This is the sociological argument to be made against globalization and centralization.
Meanwhile the “Human Rights” argument has long been used to provide moral justification for the most destructive forms of corporate transnationalism and military interventionism. We should have, coupled with the non-aggression principle, rights that extend no further than the pursuit and exertion of ownership and defense of person and property.
The Human Rights argument paves the road to hell.
Meanwhile the “Human Rights” argument has long been used to provide moral justification for the most destructive forms of corporate transnationalism and military interventionism. We should have, coupled with the non-aggression principle, rights that extend no further than the pursuit and exertion of ownership and defense of person and property.
The Human Rights argument paves the road to hell.
Comments
Post a Comment