Skip to main content
Progressive women often assert that men have no say with regard to abortion because “men don’t have a reproductive system”. Men are not capable of getting pregnant, but men have one half of the two reproductive systems needed for a pregnancy to occur. But that’s semantics. What they really mean to say is that since only women can get pregnant, they are the only ones who have the right of ultimate decision-making when it comes to abortion. Women are the gender of our two sexes that gets pregnant, that’s true, but what gives a woman the exclusive right of decision making over the life and death of a man’s children? Would it be permissible for a stranger, be they a man or a woman, to claim the exclusive right to say whether or not a man’s child be killed? He didn’t carry the baby so he should sit down and shutup?

The Progressive position also implies an exclusive and prevailing association between the female gender and the very position of being “pro-choice”, as if to say “Of course women are pro-choice, they are women!” But there are plenty of men who are pro-choice and many women who are not. On the abortion position there are in reality only two groups of people – those who take for themselves the right to choose personal convenience over the life of a helpless human being, and those who do not.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marginalized Debate

The media has made a big to-do about the Rick Santelli "rant" on CNBC recently. The first thing that anyone needs to know about the media is that it is never intentionally meant to be informative or helpful in a way that affects their lives in a meaningful and positive way. What the media IS meant for is selling products and controlling information to serve the interests of those who run it. Any instance of the contrary is unintended or accidental. That said, let us all please avoid the fantasy that this "rant" we all witnessed was a moment of truth slipping through the cracks or that it was anything other than a staging point for controlled and marginalized debate. This particular type of propaganda always reminds me of a conflict one might have with someone who is completely wrong or crazy yet some incense-burning, age of Aquarius conscious wacka-doodle floats out of the woodworks and insists that "there are two sides to every story and the truth is somewhere...
2 comments
Read more

War in Somalia

It now appears that a large US military force will need to be deployed to northern Africa in the near future. Of course the requisite media inculcation will proceed and create the sufficient fervor and righteous confidence of the citizenry in the mission ahead, despite the casualties or true losses of our imperial aims there. The US military and CIA have been operating in and around Somalia for over two decades now and the growing instability of that region, culminated by a collapse of the most recent CIA backed government there in 2007, has prompted decisions in the beltway that more than subversive forces are needed to maintain control. The latest “pirate” story, including the kidnapping of a US ship captain, is being promoted on the media grid with the usual meter and appearance of thoughtful restraint. Instead of just saying that we are sending troops to northern Africa as part of the control of the resources in the middle east and central Asia, the TAPI pipeline, etc., a decision ...
2 comments
Read more
The DNC fraud lawsuit, which is actually a HUGE deal, is completely blacked out by the mainstream media. This is because it would uncover the truth that any "hacking" nonsense was done within the DNC itself, first to nail Bernie Sanders. After the election, forces in the DNC and in the intelligence community have made it look like "Guccifer 2.0" was a Russian operative.
Post a Comment
Read more